Unlike many business functions, finance operates with very little room for error. A miscalculation in forecasting or a flaw in reporting could ripple out, impacting investment decisions, regulatory compliance, and overall financial stability. Therefore, integrating AI into financial processes requires a strategic focus on controls and checkpoints that maintain this critical accuracy.

The key to successful AI integration is understanding where and how to place controls that ensure reliability without blocking innovation.

AI can perform some of these controls using the prompt examples provided below. However, many of these critical checkpoints still require human oversight, particularly in high-risk or compliance-heavy areas.

Effectively designing these checkpoints is a significant part of the AI implementation process—one that must be addressed case by case, depending on the specific financial workflow and risk exposure.

When designing an effective control framework, we need to consider three main areas:

1. Input Validation:

The saying “garbage in, garbage out” is never more true than with AI. Flawed or incomplete data leads to flawed predictions and reports. Input validation routines should be implemented to check for:

• Data Completeness: Ensuring that all required fields are filled and there are no gaps in the dataset. Prompt: "When processing the dataset, check for any missing fields or incomplete rows. Flag any discrepancies for review."
• Correct Formatting: Verifying that financial figures, dates, and currency formats are consistent. Prompt: "Analyze the dataset and ensure all dates follow the format YYYY-MM-DD, currency figures are formatted with two decimal points, and all numerical data is correctly aligned."
• Integrity of Imported Data: Making sure there are no missing transactions or discrepancies when importing data from accounting software or spreadsheets. Prompt: "Cross-reference imported financial data against source reports. Identify any transactions that are missing or do not align with the original records."

Human Oversight: AI can never validate whether your data truly makes sense, whether you are comparing apples to oranges, or whether you are using inconsistent data. Therefore, when implementing AI in your workflow, think critically! AI will never replace your unique knowledge of the company, data, and processes, so remember to utilize it.

2. Process Checkpoints:

Financial workflows are not a single step but a series of interconnected processes. AI must move through these processes without compounding errors for it to perform effectively. Key checkpoints should include:

• Data Reconciliation Checkpoints: AI can be configured to pause and cross-check balances at various stages of processing. Prompt: "At each stage of data processing, compare account balances against the previous stage to identify any discrepancies."
• Variance Analysis: Automated variance analysis that flags deviations from expected patterns, prompting a manual review. Prompt: "Compare forecasted values with actuals. Highlight any variances greater than 5% for further analysis."
• Cross-Referencing with Historical Data: This helps identify outliers by comparing real-time data with historical records. Prompt: "Analyze current data trends against historical financial performance. Flag any outliers with deviations above the threshold.

Human Oversight: AI helps a lot with automated verification and flagging; however, it remains up to your judgment to identify the acceptable thresholds, tell AI how exactly the data should be verified (compared to the previous year, previous quarter, or forecast), and design these validation steps.

3. Output Verification:

The final output must be verified, even with robust input validation and process checkpoints. CFOs should implement:

• Sampling of AI-Generated Reports: Randomly select sections of the AI-generated financial statements for manual inspection. Prompt: "Select random samples from the final report. Cross-check figures and summaries for consistency with original data inputs."
• Comparison Against Historical Performance: Ensuring the AI-driven reports align with expected outcomes based on historical data. Prompt: "Analyze key financial metrics against historical performance for anomalies. Highlight any unexpected changes for manual review."
• Audit Trails: Every AI-driven report should have a traceable path back to its original data source for validation. Prompt: "For each financial output, create an audit trail that maps data back to its source document, including date, time, and version."

Human Oversight: Everyone who has been in a finance leadership role long enough and managed teams has some system for validating the information. After all, we are responsible as CFOs for something that our teams have done. Use the same logic with AI-generated outputs—treat them as if a recent college graduate has been working on them—scan for discrepancies, formula integrity, and consistency. Always read your reports and add your unique perspective to them.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid:

• Assuming AI will always be accurate. Even the best-trained models can fail if the underlying data changes or the context shifts. Always pair AI outputs with contextual human analysis.
• Overlooking the need for human intervention. Some steps, especially those requiring nuanced judgment, must always involve a human expert.
  Implementing controls without assessing their relevance. Not all AI-driven processes need the same level of oversight. Customize controls based on the process's risk and criticality.
• Focusing solely on automation without accountability. Even with automated checks, there must be a clear line of responsibility for oversight and error handling.

Building bulletproof AI controls isn’t just about error prevention—it’s about trust. When you can confidently rely on your AI-driven reports, forecasting, and budgeting processes, you unlock the real value of automation: more time for strategic thinking and better decision-making.

As finance leaders, our role is not just to adopt new technologies but to adopt them responsibly. By combining the efficiency of AI with well-placed human oversight, we can transform high-stakes financial workflows into models of accuracy and reliability.

‍